SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (199829)5/3/2009 11:48:50 AM
From: neolibRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 306849
 
So, are you suggesting that insurance companies (or a single government payer) should just pay all claims without any review process, whatsoever?

No, I can't understand what advantages single government payer would bring. Other people seem to see some. I can't get any of them to describe what those advantages are.


As pointed out previously, very few claims involve paper, stamps or envelopes.


Are you claiming bills are not mailed to customers? As I said, the insurance co mails me a statement, and the Doc does as well. I can't say what happens between the Doc and the Insurance co. Do you really think that 95% of statements to the customer are done electronically. I've never seen that at all, so I seriously doubt the 95% claim.

Medicare Part D may be an excellent model.

Medicare Part D is the poster child for stupidity in medical spending. It uses insurance mechanisms to cover statistically likely, bottom end costs. Insurance should only be used to cover the statistically unlikely, high end costs.

Its equivalent to thinking that an insurance policy which has zero deductible and a $25000 cap is a good policy, compared to one with a 5000 deductible and $1M in coverage. I saw that one myself when the small company I worked for was bought by a larger company, and they offered us this "really great" insurance package. Several Phd's (in engineering from Stanford and MIT) actually thought it was great, because all they looked at was the deductible. They didn't have a clue what insurance is about. I succeeded in getting them to dump that splendid offer and replace it with a more intelligent one.



To: i-node who wrote (199829)5/3/2009 4:18:06 PM
From: NOWRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
<Well beyond 95% of the claims our clients generate>
so care to share what your field of work is?
I suspect you would be a victim of the creation of a rational system of healthcare delivery.



To: i-node who wrote (199829)5/3/2009 4:19:00 PM
From: NOWRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
"Medicare Part D may be an excellent model"
PArt D is an atrocious nightmare