SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (64257)5/3/2009 6:23:23 PM
From: TideGlider4 Recommendations  Respond to of 224757
 
Kenneth she isn't a constitutional scholar. She has NO legal experience. Obeying the law she has as much experience as any other 69 year old woman. However, you simply made a real error and now you want to polish the turd you dropped.

You don't learn to interpret the constitution with on the job training.

She is more experienced at applying the law than any of the Supreme Court Justices Give me an example of where this congress person has applied law! Even though it really doesn't matter. The entire delusion of yours is an incredible hoot!

It won't be removed either. lol



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (64257)5/4/2009 8:47:18 AM
From: jlallen2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224757
 
lol

You can't be that dumb.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (64257)5/4/2009 10:21:32 AM
From: Alan Smithee1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224757
 
Boxer applies the law everyday. She is more experienced at applying the law than any of the Supreme Court Justices.

Does she apply the law with a brush or roller?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News