Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (477550)	5/4/2009 5:52:13 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574249

"I don't read much of their stuff but I've no doubt you have problems with facts and the truth everywhere you go." Only if you label 'fantasies' as facts and truth. "I don't remember you ever saying that but I also don't want to wade through all your crappy posts to see if you did or didn't. It's not that big a deal to me." At least you are willing to admit you were lying. "Nope. It's true." Not really. "Today I was exposing Tejek for his racism and you raced in to rave about how distressed you were at my mis-spelling of a word of Germanic origin." Like I said. You openly fantasize. I am constantly amazed that you are unable to master a spellchecker. Anybody with active brain cells would realize that when you are reduced to spelling phonetically, you probably should use a different word. But, not our brainless_. "Yeah we all believe spelling the word klutz wrong was behind all that.<sarcasm>" Well, you have shown that you prefer your own fantasies instead of anything that might smack of reality. Your 'cluts' was so obviously stupid that I couldn't let it go. "How sweet. " And there you go again. Can't even get through a whole post without doing that, can you? You really should consider therapy. "No I'm not." Now, see, there you go. Lying. Again. This is what you posted. "You kiss tejek's jewels all the time on this thread, are you a racist?" Then you tried to lie and claimed that you were talking about something else by posting this. "tejek said that poster showing Obama kissing the King's jewels was racist, you say the imagery is homo-erotic" Which is not the same as you original post or what you are now claiming. Because "I said it was like the Poster accusing Obama of kissing the King's jewels, which he claimed was racist. You said it seemed homo-erotic." Is only vaguely similar to your two previous statements. An ever changing story is the epitome of wiggling and squirming.