SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: one_less who wrote (477866)5/5/2009 12:00:05 PM
From: i-node1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1574852
 
It was a secondary effect of the massive water down pour not the force of the hurricane

This is the key point. It wasn't the hurricane that caused the problem. The hurricane damage was far worse from Slidell to Biloxi than it was in NOLA.

A flood is a different thing from a hurricane. There was no access into the city -- at least not something suitable for supplies to get in. It was totally closed off from the East and from the Causeway. Parts of I10 were underwater into downtown making it impassable.

Why was it not Nagin's responsibility to be sure there were adequate supplies, facilities, and water at the Convention Center and Superdome? Everyone knew these were the highest ground.

Bush is a scapegoat for incompetent city management which DID NOT EVEN HAVE any disaster plan. It was so insubstantial that the first thing Nagin did after the storm was to have the disaster plan removed from the website so as to ameliorate the blame for not having a plan.

WE also forget that the federal government had every helicopter available rescuing people from rooftops -- where Nagin had claimed 10,000 people were dying. This successful rescues of thousands is all but overlooked by those claiming the federal government was MIA. Who was MIA? The NOLA police department. Over half deserted, some stealing new Cadillacs from Sewell Village in the process.



To: one_less who wrote (477866)5/5/2009 7:00:35 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574852
 
Following the collapse of the levees, suddenly everyone became an expert and knew Bush should have done something ahead of time and had a better reaction afterwords. Bunch a friggen monday morning quarterbacks.

Okay. Its my contention that the Bush response to Katrina is one of the major reasons why the Rs lost the election in 2006. If you disagree, then why do you think the 2006 election did not work out for the Rs?