Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (477958)	5/5/2009 2:41:55 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578093

"All you have to do is create an imaginary opposing argument" Exactly. Which I didn't do. "Learn to Wiki:" I don't have to. I know what a RAA argument is. "There was nothing "logical" with the way you twisted my argument." Sure there was. Your stance was that 37.5 tons of high explosive delivered by precision munitions, enough to flatten a small town, was not a significant response. And that raises the question, what would be a significant response? "Face it, you were caught making a straw man argument." Other than the fact it wasn't an argument, much less a straw man argument, I suppose you have a point. So now you have not only proven you don't know what a straw man argument is, you also apparently can't distinguish an argument from a statement. Your ability to reason logically is sort of questionable, also.