Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (478201)	5/5/2009 10:26:32 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576902

That was just silly. You must be drunk again dude, which seems like the only time you even have confidence to post to me anymore. Courage from a bottle isn't real and in the morning, when you lift your self out of your puke, you will realize those posts are not as brilliant and kick ass as they seem from the bottom of the liguor bottle.

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (478201)	5/6/2009 8:23:11 AM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576902

Why doesn't Congress pass a law describing exactly what is torture and what isn't? Then at least interrogators would know what they can do and what they can't. In 2002 and 2003 Pelosi, Rockefeller, and other Congressional leaders gave their approval of waterboarding. Now liberals are saying its torture. Let Congress define torture - what it is and what it isn't - in legislation. The way it stands now anything could be called torture. As I've pointed out even your idea of having a woman infidel read to them could be mental or emotional torture. Obama should write up a law and forward it to Congress. He's not off the hook either.