Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (24160)	10/27/1997 5:35:00 PM
From: Joseph G.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 132070

Mike, did you have, by any chance, many bulls today tell you it is stupid not have bot AMAT at 52 and CPQ at 78? -g- Joe

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (24160)	10/28/1997 2:27:00 AM
From: Kathleen capps	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Thanks for your imput Mike, While I don't like HMO's, I don't see how we can get away from them, the way the govt is going. It will continue to be big business. I kind of thinking we are seeing the same sort of thing that happened with the Drug stocks in the early 90's. They aren't going away and sooner or later will bounce back. I've been watching OXHP for a long time -- good thing I watched and didn't get in at $70 -vbg --. Anyway, I bought my first 1/3 at $27. I'm sure I will do okay in the long run and will watch for further shakeouts/declines in the price. What do you think of Columbia and UNH? And iff they all fall off the cliff in sympathy or with the market, would you buy the lot or just stick with OXHP? How low would OXHP have to go for you to be tempted again -- although I suppose that if the whole market is in the dumps, OXHP would have an even lower buy price to seem attractive. Thanks again for all the great discussion you provide! It's been really helpful for me learning (and earning). Kathleen