SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio candidates - Moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2572)5/8/2009 4:50:38 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
Tech bellwethers say dawn of recovery may be near

marketwatch.com



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2572)5/14/2009 5:01:20 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2955
 
SAP Could Hold Key to App Battle

thestreet.com

By James Rogers

05/12/09 - 05:39 PM EDT

Rumors that Microsoft(MSFT Quote) is planning to buy SAP(SAP Quote) may be wide of the mark, but the German software giant is still seen as a key player in a turbulent tech landscape.

Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer dismissed recent speculation about a SAP purchase as "random rumor" on Tuesday, according to media reports. Ballmer poured water on the rumor just a day after Microsoft sold a $3.75 billion debt issue, which had added fuel to the M&A chatter.

With the tech sector in a state of flux, however, there is a great deal of interest in which firms will be next on the block. Oracle's(ORCL Quote) recent acquisition of Sun Microsystems(JAVA Quote), for example, was a surprise move that sent shockwaves though the software sector.

By adding its database software to Sun's Java, Solaris, MySQL and server technology, Oracle could pose a serious challenge, not just to SAP, but also to some of its key competitors.

"Our view is that the Oracle-Sun deal may be a net negative for both IBM and SAP," wrote Patrick Walravens, an analyst at JMP Securities, in a recent note. "For SAP, it is losing more and more of the [application software] stack."

The analyst explained the some SAP installations will now sit on a Sun server running the Solaris operating system and an Oracle database, meaning that Sun/Oracle owns a significant chunk of the software market.

IBM(IBM Quote), which had attempted to buy Sun before Oracle stepped in, could even fix its sights on SAP, according to Walravens.

"As Oracle opens more fronts against IBM, we believe IBM may eventually decide to move into the applications business in a big way, perhaps by acquiring SAP," he wrote. "Just as Oracle is actively converting PeopleSoft, JDE, and Siebel customers to the Oracle [application] stack, if IBM bought SAP it could try to move SAP customers to its stack."

SAP CEO Leo Apotheker refused to comment on the Microsoft chatter at a news conference earlier this week but said that it is in the company's best interest to stay independent, according to Reuters.

"Our customers believe an independent SAP is the best value they can get," he said.

Despite SAP's desire to remain a standalone company, at least one tech sector CEO would not be surprised if the company still becomes M&A bait.

"We think there's a big battle emerging in the tech field," said Sunny Gupta, CEO of Seattle, Wash.-based software company Apptio. "When you start looking at IBM, and you start looking at Microsoft, they need a very deep application stack to compete against the likes of Oracle."

Gupta explained that Microsoft has already made some investments in its application business such as its acquisition of Great Plains Software, but these efforts have mainly focused on mid-market.

"The number one [enterprise] player out there is SAP -- the only way for companies like IBM and Microsoft to compete with Oracle is to buy SAP," he added. "The way that the landscape is shaping up, it wouldn't surprise me, and I wouldn't even rule out H-P."

A long-standing Microsoft partner, SAP has not had the easiest time of it recently, and that has probably contributed to the M&A rumors. Last month the Waldorf, Germany-based firm reported a decline in first-quarter net income as software revenue fell 33%.

SAP's shares rose 7 cents, or 0.2%, to $40.02 on Tuesday, as the Nasdaq slipped 0.88%.



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2572)5/20/2009 7:35:37 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
NetApp Agrees to Buy Data Domain for $25 a Share

By Lisa Wolfson and Connie Guglielmo

May 20 (Bloomberg) -- NetApp Inc., the maker of storage computers, agreed to buy Data Domain Inc. for about $1.5 billion to add disk backup services.

Holders of Data Domain stock will get $11.45 in cash and 0.75 of a NetApp share, based on yesterday’s closing price, Sunnyvale, California-based NetApp said today on a conference call. The $25-a-share deal should close in two to four months.

Data Domain makes hardware and software that helps customers such as AT&T Inc. and the U.S. Defense Department back up data on disks rather than tape. NetApp Chief Executive Officer Dan Warmenhoven said that there’s little overlap between the companies and NetApp has the distribution channels and global reach to put Domain’s products in front of more clients.

“It makes a lot of sense for both companies,” said Michael Holt, an analyst at Morningstar Inc. in Chicago. “It’s just expensive.” Holt, who doesn’t own NetApp shares, said Data Domain has great technology, not much distribution and “really limited resources to reinvest.”

NetApp dropped 29 cents, or 1.7 percent, to $17.05 in late trading after announcing the deal. The shares, up 24 percent this year, closed at $17.34 on the Nasdaq Stock Market. Data Domain, based in nearby Santa Clara, surged $6.09, or 34 percent, to $24 after hours. It closed at $17.91 on the Nasdaq.

Boost to Earnings

The purchase should start adding to NetApp’s earnings after four quarters, Warmenhoven said in a telephone interview. Data Domain gets about a fifth of its sales from outside the U.S., giving NetApp new products to sell through its overseas network. International sales make up more than half of NetApp’s revenue.

NetApp had $2.46 billion of cash and marketable securities at the end of the first quarter.

Data Domain sells products that recognize multiple copies of the same document and store only one, cutting storage costs. Its revenue more than doubled last year to $274 million. Net income of $21.6 million in 2008 compared with a loss of $3.7 million a year earlier.

NetApp, whose customers include Oracle Corp., reported a fourth-quarter profit excluding some items of 31 cents a share, topping the average 23-cent estimate of analysts in a Bloomberg survey. Sales fell 6.2 percent to $879.6 million, the company said today. That also exceeded analysts’ projections.

Analysts have listed NetApp among possible takeover targets by Cisco Systems Inc., International Business Machines Corp. and Hewlett-Packard Co. Warmenhoven said today that reports of an “impending acquisition are greatly exaggerated.”

“Anyone who wants to make a big enough offer could probably acquire us,” Warmenhoven said. “They’re not coming to the table. Personally, I think it’s a very, very low probability anyone would make an offer to acquire NetApp.”

Last Updated: May 20, 2009 18:47 EDT



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2572)6/2/2009 2:16:54 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
EMC Tries to Wrest Data Domain From NetApp With Bid (Update1)

By Dina Bass, Zachary R. Mider and Ian King

June 2 (Bloomberg) -- EMC Corp. tried to wrest control of Data Domain Inc. with a $1.8 billion unsolicited bid, challenging a $1.5 billion offer from NetApp Inc. two weeks ago.

EMC, the world’s biggest maker of storage computers, offered $30 a share in cash yesterday for Data Domain. NetApp’s cash and stock agreement is valued at $25.56 a share, based on yesterday’s closing price, making EMC’s bid 17 percent higher.

The offer threatens to derail NetApp’s plans to expand in the market for systems that reduce the amount of disk space needed to store data. An acquisition would allow EMC to sell $1 billion of those kinds of products next year, Chief Executive Officer Joe Tucci said.

“Data Domain was creating a lot of problems for EMC,” said Alex Kurtz, an analyst at Merriman Curhan Ford & Co. in San Francisco. “EMC is ready to go to the mat” to prevent Data Domain’s combination with NetApp, he said.

Data Domain, based in Santa Clara, California, rose $4.61, or 18 percent, to $30.96 at 10:04 a.m. New York time in Nasdaq Stock Market trading. EMC, in Hopkinton, Massachusetts, added 16 cents to $12.58 on the New York Stock Exchange. NetApp dropped 70 cents, or 3.4 percent, to $19.99 on the Nasdaq.

Edward Luboja, a spokesman for Santa Clara, California- based Data Domain, declined to comment. Lindsey Smith, a spokeswoman for Sunnyvale, California-based NetApp, also declined to comment.

Multiple Copies

Under the NetApp plan, Data Domain investors would get $11.45 in cash and an amount of NetApp stock that varies based on the buyer’s share price. When NetApp’s share price is more than $19.88, as it was at the close of trading yesterday, the exchange ratio is 0.682, valuing the NetApp takeover at $25.56 a share.

“Obviously EMC is a company with substantially more resources behind it, so in the contest, the favor goes to EMC,” said Brian Marshall, a San Francisco-based analyst for Broadpoint Amtech.

Data Domain, whose customers include AT&T Inc. and the U.S. Defense Department, sells products that eliminate the need to store multiple copies of the same document, cutting costs. While EMC acquired similar products in the 2006 acquisition of Avamar Technologies Inc., Data Domain’s products work better with the large amounts of data generated by accounting software and e- mail servers, Tucci said in an interview.

“There are two very distinct use cases,” said Tucci, 61. “You could take a nail and hit it with pliers and or hit it with a hammer. You get better results when you use the right tool.”

Profit Forecasts

The acquisition wouldn’t change EMC’s profit in the current year, excluding some costs, and would add to earnings next year, the company said.

EMC and Data Domain have held talks over the years about sales partnerships, Tucci said. He said in a letter yesterday to Data Domain CEO Frank Slootman that EMC had been interested in buying Data Domain prior to the NetApp agreement.

EMC had to mount an unsolicited bid because Data Domain was prohibited from talking with rival suitors as part of its agreement with NetApp, Tucci said. Data Domain’s revenue more than doubled last year to $274 million. Net income was $21.6 million in 2008, compared with a loss of $3.7 million a year earlier.

EMC’s $1.8 billion offer value excludes Data Domain’s cash. Data Domain had about $250 million in cash and short-term investments at the end of March, meaning that the value of the deal for shareholders would be more than $2 billion.

To contact the reporters on this story: Dina Bass in Seattle at dbass2@bloomberg.net; Zachary R. Mider in New York at zmider1@bloomberg.net; Ian King in San Francisco at ianking@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: June 2, 2009 10:13 EDT



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2572)7/13/2009 9:27:13 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
09:22 CSCO Cisco Systems: Lazard Capital Mkts sees co tracking ahead with improved bookings growth and linearity throughout the qtr (18.34 )

Lazard Capital Mkts recent inputs suggest that 4Q09 is tracking ahead with improved bookings growth and linearity throughout the qtr. Strength is being attributed to an uptick in switching, stabilizing routing, and continued successes with the advanced technology portfolio. Firm believes demand has leveled off and a bottom was likely formed in 3Q. Checks suggest aggressive expense management during the quarter as planned, including further headcount reductions and discretionary spending cuts. As such, firm thinks CSCO's goal of reducing the total annualized expense run rate by as much as $1.5 bln exiting the yr is achievable. Firm concludes that CSCO's 4Q09 rev is likely tracking down 16.5-17% YoY compared with the consensus view of down 18.2%



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2572)7/14/2009 7:29:57 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
Microsoft Sets Aggressive 'Cloud Computing' Prices

online.wsj.com

JULY 14, 2009, 6:29 P.M. ET

By JESSICA HODGSON and SCOTT MORRISON

SAN FRANCISCO -- Microsoft Corp. unveiled some of its pricing for its "cloud computing" platform, Windows Azure, Tuesday in the latest signal the software company intends to compete aggressively in the emerging market to provide enterprise computer services over the Internet.

Azure, which Microsoft announced eight months ago, is the central plank of the company's strategy to grab a share of the market that lets customers access computer services online and pay for them on a metered basis.

"Microsoft is throwing down the gauntlet and saying it's going toe to toe with cloud providers," said Dana Gardner, a principal analyst at Interarbor Solutions.

In becoming a cloud computing provider, the Redmond, Wash.-based Microsoft must balance the advantages of creating a new revenue stream against the potential loss of sales from its key software franchises, including the Windows operating system and server tools that may be supplanted by the new services.

With Azure, Microsoft will compete with such other cloud computing pioneers as online retailer Amazon.com Inc., archrival Google Inc. and the software-as-a-service provider Salesforce.com Inc.

Azure will provide the platform on which independent software developers and corporate customers can create Microsoft-compatible cloud applications. On Monday, Microsoft announced it will offer Web-based versions of its popular Office suite of applications to consumers.

The company's shares closed down 0.5% Tuesday at $23.11.

Microsoft's initial payment plans are targeted at the independent software developers that build applications designed to run on Microsoft's platform, though the company will attempt to sell the services to its corporate end users later. The plans include fees for the computing and storage capabilities that are used.

Microsoft will offer a discount of 15% to 30% to developers and resellers who sign on for six months or more. It plans to unveil pricing for corporate customers in the second half of its fiscal year, which began in July.

For pay per use, Microsoft will charge 12 cents an hour for computing, 15 cents per gigabyte for storage and 10 cents per 10,000 storage transactions.

Although its pricing model offers different tiers so a direct comparison is difficult, Amazon.com charges 12.5 cents an hour and 15 cents a gigabyte for storage in two of its pricing models.

Bob Muglia, who heads Microsoft's servers business, said the key appeal of Windows Azure will be helping customers minimize the labor costs associated with maintaining data centers. Customers will be able to run Azure applications that are based either at Microsoft's or their own data centers.

Mr. Muglia said the market for cloud computing services is still very undeveloped, so Microsoft has an opportunity to build market share quickly. While he acknowledged that Microsoft's profits from the tools it sells to provide cloud services will likely be lower than its profits for on-premise software, he said he expects this to be offset by the number of customers choosing to host services on Azure.



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2572)7/21/2009 4:42:14 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
As Microsoft makes a move to take a bite of Apple’s fortune, retailers and analysts say stores could be a hit

boston.com



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2572)8/6/2009 6:54:19 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
Chambers Push Into Servers Pits Cisco Against Hewlett-Packard

By Rochelle Garner

Aug. 6 (Bloomberg) -- Cisco Systems Inc. Chief Executive Officer John Chambers, facing four straight quarters of falling sales, is taking on the computer industry’s biggest companies to expand beyond networking equipment into computer servers.

Chambers said yesterday that revenue this quarter will fall at least 15 percent. To reach his target for annual sales growth of as much as 17 percent, Cisco is pushing into the market for computers used in corporate data centers, where it faces off with Hewlett-Packard Co. and International Business Machines Corp.

“There are times when you move into new markets, like the data center, and the incumbents view that as a challenge,” Chambers said yesterday in an interview. “IBM is a partner -- we’ll see how tight the partnership develops. That’s kind of a work in progress on both sides. H-P is clearly a competitor.”

Demand for Cisco’s routers and switches has slowed as companies such as Google Inc. and Microsoft Corp. respond to the recession by cutting back on gear for data centers, the rooms of computers that store information and run Web sites, according to Simon Leopold, an analyst at Morgan Keegan & Co. in New York. To counter that slowdown, Cisco last month began selling its Unified Computing System, a combination of computer servers, storage devices and networking gear.

Profit Pools

“They need more and bigger profit pools to tap into to keep growing revenue,” Mark Demos, a portfolio manager at Fifth Third Asset Management, said in an interview from Minneapolis. He helps manage $19.8 billion in assets, including almost 3 million shares of Cisco, according to Bloomberg data. “With the data center effort, they can go to a lot of companies that are existing customers and they are betting their good name can transfer into other areas.”

Cisco, the world’s largest maker of networking equipment, reported a 46 percent plunge in fourth-quarter profit yesterday to $1.08 billion, from $2.01 billion a year earlier. Revenue fell 18 percent to $8.54 billion in the quarter, which ended July 25.

Cisco, based in San Jose, California, fell 76 cents, or 3.4 percent, to $21.41 yesterday in extended trading. The shares have advanced 36 percent this year.

Chambers is making a winner-take-all bet by going after Hewlett-Packard and IBM, said Ray Lane, managing partner at venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers in Menlo Park, California. Hewlett-Packard and IBM sell Cisco’s network equipment -- relationships that may come under strain as the companies compete for clients, he said.

‘Win or Lose’

“I don’t question his strategy, but it’s risky because they are committing themselves to win or lose,” said Lane, the former president of Oracle Corp., who has known Chambers for about 30 years. “They will lose these partners as they compete.”

Sales of routers, which accounted for 17 percent of Cisco’s $36.1 billion in sales last year, will drop 20 percent industrywide in 2009, according to Dell’Oro Group, a market researcher in Redwood City, California. Revenue from switches, which made up about a third of sales, will drop 19 percent, the sharpest decline in eight years, the researcher said.

IBM, the world’s largest computer-services company, had about 30.7 percent of the worldwide computer-server market in the first quarter, compared with 28.8 percent for Hewlett- Packard, according to Gartner Inc., a research firm in Stamford, Connecticut. Cisco doesn’t feature in the rankings. Total server sales were $53.1 billion last year.

‘Cozy Partners’

“People are getting into each others’ business, and when that happens, people feel like their toes get stepped on,” Toni Sacconaghi, a New York-based analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., said at a conference in May. In the past, Hewlett-Packard and Cisco would work together to supply customers with products. “They were cozy partners before, and now they are competing much more aggressively.”

Chambers, who turns 60 this month, said the impact of losing sales through Hewlett-Packard won’t be “that great” because most of Cisco’s orders come directly from customers.

Gina Giamanco, a spokeswoman for Palo Alto, California- based Hewlett-Packard, declined to comment. Ian Colley, a spokesman for Armonk, New York-based IBM, also wouldn’t comment.

IBM still works with Cisco in markets where they don’t directly compete. The two companies, for example, are working together on so-called smart grids, providing meters and other networking gear to power utilities.

Work in Harmony

“If it was up to Cisco, they’d much rather work in harmony with these companies,” said Brian Halla, a Cisco director and CEO of chipmaker National Semiconductor Corp. in Santa Clara, California. Chambers typically wants companies to cooperate rather than fight, he said. “At the same time, Cisco is so determined that they won’t let anything stand in the way of the bigger vision” of finding new markets, he said.

One challenge for Cisco will be persuading clients to buy one product that comprises storage, networking and servers. Customers typically have different managers responsible for making those purchasing decisions, said Jayshree Ullal, CEO of startup Arista Networks Inc., who worked at Cisco for 15 years and reported to Chambers. The global recession also may complicate Chambers’s plans, she said.

“Everyone retrenches in a bad economy, so his timing might be off,” Ullal said in an interview from Menlo Park, California. “This is by far his most difficult endeavor.”

30 Markets

To meet Chambers’s goal, Cisco has laid out 30 new growth areas. These include consumer and video products, as well as smart-grid equipment. Chambers said yesterday he plans to go after even more markets.

In May, Chambers said he expected to use Cisco’s cash to acquire companies to get into those areas. The company had $35 billion in cash at the end of last quarter.

Chambers, who was born in Cleveland and raised in Charleston, West Virginia, joined Cisco in 1991 as head of sales. He became the company’s second CEO in 1995, steering Cisco through the Internet boom and the crash in 2000.

A fan of duck hunting, Chambers speaks with a pronounced West Virginia accent. Before Cisco, Chambers spent eight years at computer company Wang Laboratories and six years at IBM. He has a bachelor’s and a law degree from West Virginia University and an MBA from Indiana University. “I never intended to get into law,” he said.

Cisco is going after markets that are all linked to networking and sharing information, said Carol Bartz, CEO of Yahoo! Inc. and lead director at Cisco since 2005.

“John has a really clear vision, and he organizes the company around the vision,” Bartz said in an interview this week. “He inspires the naysayers.”

Chambers says Cisco has anticipated changes in its business in the past. In 1998, the company paid $145 million for Selsius Systems Inc., acquiring equipment that handles phone calls over the Internet. Cisco’s revenue from that business passed $1 billion in 2005.

“We are very good at catching market transitions, and as we do that we usually take our partners with us,” Chambers said. “But as you move into new markets you often make new partners.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Rochelle Garner in San Francisco at rgarner4@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: August 6, 2009 00:01 EDT



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2572)8/29/2009 11:51:17 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
Microsoft is a come-from-behind favorite in at least one area of virtualization led by VMware...

internetnews.com

By Stuart J. Johnston
Internet News
August 28, 2009

Many technology areas are still hurting due to the long-running recession. However, one area that appears to be a harbinger of good news is virtualization, according to a new report.

That's good news, not only for established virtualization market leaders like VMware (NYSE: VMW) and Citrix (NASDAQ: CTXS), but newcomers like Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT), as well.

The report, by Information Technology Intelligence Corp. (ITIC), surveyed 700 corporations worldwide and found that server virtualization deployments "have remained strong throughout the ongoing 2009 economic downturn."

ITIC principal analyst Laura DiDio conducted the independent survey in May, June and August. The report results were released Thursday.

Among its conclusions are that Microsoft, despite a late start in most virtualization markets, is becoming the come-from-behind favorite, at least in the area of application virtualization.

"Thanks to the summer release of the new Hyper-V with live migration capabilities, with Hyper-V 2.0, Microsoft has substantially closed the feature/performance gap between itself and VMware’s ESX Server," the report states.

Another top level take away for Microsoft: "Three out of five -- 59 percent of the survey respondents -- indicated their intent to deploy Hyper-V 2.0 within the next 12 to 18 months."

"With Hyper-V, Microsoft has a very credible, competitive offering," DiDio told InternetNews.com. "Hypervisors, in general, have been commoditized" due to Microsoft's commodity approach to virtualization.

That doesn't mean, however, that Microsoft will have the whole pie.

For instance, Citrix is the market leader in desktop virtualization with a 19 percent market share.

In the same market, Microsoft holds a 15 percent share and VMware has 8 percent.

We have just begun to virtualize

To put that in perspective, though, more than 60 percent of corporations haven't begun virtualizing their desktop environments yet.

Meanwhile, VMware remains the market leader in server virtualization with approximately 50 percent share among enterprise users, the report says. Microsoft trails in server virtualization with 26 percent market share.

"The first wave [of adopters] went with VMware's ESX Server, and for good reason, because they were the only company out there," DiDio said.

In the area of application virtualization, Microsoft leads with a 15 percent share. In the same market, Citrix holds 11 percent, with VMware following with 7 percent. Tempering those numbers however, "nearly two-thirds of businesses have not yet deployed application virtualization," the report says.

Additionally, while the market is still in growth mode, it's not boiling down to a winner-takes-all card game, DiDio added.

"Forty percent of survey respondents say 'We are going to be using virtualization products from multiple vendors,' so a win for Microsoft is not necessarily a loss for VMware," she said.



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2572)9/20/2009 12:57:50 PM
From: stockman_scott1 Recommendation  Respond to of 2955
 
IBM’s Shares Mark Their Longest Rising Streak Since May 2007

By Katie Hoffmann

Sept. 18 (Bloomberg) -- International Business Machines Corp. shares rose for a seventh straight day in the longest streak in more than two years, spurred by analysts’ predictions of wider profit margins.

IBM, based in Armonk, New York, added 23 cents to $122.11 at 4 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The shares, up 45 percent this year, last had a seven-day rising streak in May 2007.

IBM, the world’s largest provider of computer services, increased its profit margins in July for the seventh straight quarter. The company has focused on more-profitable software and services, rather than hardware, and shifted jobs to lower-cost regions. Since July, more than half of the 26 IBM analysts surveyed by Bloomberg have raised their price targets -- many saying that profit margins have room to grow.

Wall Street has underestimated IBM’s earnings this year because it hasn’t taken the company’s profit margins and dependable revenue sources into account, Rob Cihra, an analyst at Caris & Co. in New York, said in report today. He increased his price target $10 to $145, making him at least the fourth analyst to predict that IBM shares will reach $140 or more.

Earlier this month, the company reaffirmed its full-year profit forecast of at least $9.70 a share and said it’s “well ahead” of a 2010 goal of at least $10 a share. Software and services now make up more than 80 percent of the company’s profit. That’s helped buoy earnings even as the recession crimps sales.

Price Goals

Sanford C. Bernstein & Co.’s Toni Sacconaghi, the top- ranked analyst by Institutional Investor, boosted his target by 7.7 percent to $140 last month, citing the potential for wider margins. This month, Kathryn Huberty, an analyst at Morgan Stanley, increased her target price for IBM to $145 from $116.

Rising to at least $140 would set a record for the stock, which reached a high of $137.88 in July 1999.

IBM expanded profit margins in all units except for hardware and financing last quarter. The company’s gross margin, or the percentage of sales left after production costs, increased to 45.5 percent from 43.2 percent a year earlier.

IBM is the second-best-performing stock in the Dow Jones Industrial Average this year, trailing American Express Co.

To contact the reporter on this story: Katie Hoffmann in New York at khoffmann4@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: September 18, 2009 16:05 EDT