Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (304439)	11/3/2009 6:49:15 PM
From: Peter Dierks	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793926

Losing union reforms By James Sherk Tuesday, November 3, 2009 For American workers, it is a telling tale of two cities. Last month, workers in Wheat Ridge, Colo., won a smashing victory, holding powerful special interests accountable. In Washington, those special interests fought back, persuading President Obama to change policies to prevent it from happening again. In Wheat Ridge, Ernest Duran Jr., longtime president of United Food and Commercial Workers Local 7, ran the union as a personal fiefdom. He paid himself $162,000 a year. His son and daughter also enjoyed six-figure union salaries. He charged personal expenses to his union account: margaritas, car repairs, tickets to Denver Broncos games. Union officers and board members who questioned Duran's spending quickly lost their jobs. Now Duran has lost his. In September, members of Local 7 voted out Duran, their secretary treasurer and their recording secretary, and elected an almost entirely new board. Credit goes to transparency measures undertaken by former Labor Secretary Elaine Chao. Her Labor Department updated the financial reporting forms that unions file. She required unions to itemize expenditures and report how much they paid union employees. She modernized union trust and conflict-of-interest reporting requirements, and required unions to disclose the names of anyone buying or selling union assets. Because of these reforms, rank-and-file members of Local 7 saw how Duran spent their money -- and they wanted it stopped. Financial transparency protects union members from corrupt officers. Unfortunately, many union bosses would rather keep their members blindfolded. In Washington, organized labor heavily lobbied Obama to gut the financial transparency reforms that Chao implemented. Obama delivered. His Labor Department announced the repeal of Chao's financial transparency reforms. Observers expect the administration to also gut the itemized expenses, conflict-of-interest and the union trust reporting reforms. Why would Obama do this? The new financial transparency has benefited union members. Isn't that who unions are supposed to serve? The reforms exposed Tyrone Freeman, the disgraced former president of the Service Employees Los Angeles local, who spent hundreds of thousands of union dollars on businesses owned by his family. They revealed that the National Education Association gave $500,000 to ACORN's Brooklyn office. But union transparency has been axed anyway. Why? Politics. Unions are a powerful special-interest group. Unions spent more than $1 billion of their members' dues to elect Obama and the current Congress. So when union lobbyists asked Obama to repeal the financial transparency reforms, he asked them how quickly they wanted it done. But gutting financial transparency didn't top the union lobbyists' wish list. Eliminating the secret ballot does. Unions want to force workers to make their choice about unionizing publicly, in front of union organizers. They want to be able to pressure or threaten reluctant workers to sign on. Obama has promised to do all he can to deliver. Thanks to the power of special interests in Washington, you may lose your right to vote on joining a union. Along with it will go the right to see how your union spends your money. Is that "change you can believe in"? James Sherk is the Bradley Fellow in Labor Policy at The Heritage Foundation (heritage.org). pittsburghlive.com