Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (480378)	5/13/2009 12:58:42 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572580

Do you see any black helicopters around your house ?

To: combjelly who wrote (480378)	5/13/2009 1:07:54 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572580

But, as I noted, he talked about the two in the same speeches, often putting them together in the same sentence. Well, duh. You may recall the "Bush Doctrine"? Unless you paid close attention the message was "9/11...Saddam". So, you're blaming Bush because liberals didn't pay "close attention"? And that is what the Fox viewers picked up on. Fox Viewers? WTF are you talking about? Is this from some liberal blog you're taking as gospel or do you have a link to back up the claim that it was "Fox viewers"? His minions were often not as careful. But, that was typical. Smirk would make a speech that technically was truthful, or at least not too far off. But the speeches glossed over things and/or just sort of put two different things together as to give the appearance he is actually saying something else. Other R's would jump in, and the further they were from the president, the more likely they would put the two together. Which is how the lies got propagated without Bush actually saying it. The speech writers were pretty skilled and this sort of idea planting. This is the biggest bullshit post you've ever made. You are proven wrong and this is all you got?