Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RockyBalboa who wrote (202154)	5/13/2009 8:01:01 PM
From: Elroy Jetson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

America has certainly rolled-out the entire Boo-Hoo Chorus on behalf of bank shareholders. In Australia when a bank runs low on capital they're given a warning to raise capital within a short period of time. If the bank management is unable or unwilling to comply, the assets of insolvent banks are simply transferred to another bank. In a split-second the shareholders of the under-capitalized bank own little or nothing. Almost always nothing. For reasons I don't comprehend bank investors and bank managers in America believe they are entitled to repeated "do overs" at taxpayer expense. Worse still, our government is too cowed to pull the plug on these financial cesspools or give them a hard deadline when they cross the line. Citibank, as an example, should have vanished eight years ago when they were reporting record profits with levels of capital below regulatory levels. This certainly boosted returns for shareholders in the short-term - but we now discover this was at taxpayer expense. During the same time period National Australia Bank, either the first or second largest bank in Australia then, pulled a similar but lesser stunt of operating on the minimum capital required. Then losses in currency trading put them under the line. The Reserve Bank gave NAB 90 days to make things right. NAB management had little alternative but to sell some of their choicest assets in order to meet their deadline. Furious NAB shareholders quickly dumped NAB management and put sensible people in charge. What's sad is that in America, with our welfare mentality, I'm certain many would have blamed the Fed if they had given Citibank this shock-treatment, rather than blaming the incompetent management of Citibank. No doubt Citibank shareholders would have demanded compensation from the taxpayer because the government enforced banking regulations. The problem is, without this "icy slap across the face" for those who play fast and loose, your economy quickly develops major instabilities leading to a collapse, and you end up where we are now. Not every company and it's owners gets to survive their failures. .