Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (480584)	5/13/2009 10:06:48 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575428

>>> But afterwards, he had to scale back his ambitions. We know that now. But we could not have known it without the Iraq War. We could have suspected it (although, our CIA and no other significant Western intelligence agency did), but we could not have known it. And we could not have insured if, for example, an extremely misguided, inexperienced liberal were to be voted in as American president, the new president would have taken the correct actions to prevent Iraq from carrying out its nuclear objectives. Nobody is talking about it, but the reality is there is no way in hell Saddam was going to sit idly by while Iran goes nuclear. Wasn't going to happen. At his first opportunity -- perhaps when a weak liberal got elected American president, Saddam absolutely would have been back in the race to go nuclear. And it would not have been difficult for him to do.