SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (260173)5/14/2009 12:21:52 PM
From: TenchusatsuRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 275872
 
CJ, > The EC is claiming that Intel did that in a de facto manner.

Anything Intel does to gain market share will hurt AMD in a de facto manner. That includes making any volume discounts, apparently.

Of course AMD thinks those discounts were exclusionary. Well duh, any time AMD can't compete on price is deemed "exclusionary." Fortunately they have Neelie the Terrible who agrees with them every step of the way.

Seems like the WSJ agrees with me, though you guys will probably claim that they're in the pockets of Intel:

online.wsj.com

Tenchusatsu



To: combjelly who wrote (260173)5/14/2009 1:31:15 PM
From: Elmer PhudRespond to of 275872
 
The EC is claiming that Intel did that in a de facto manner. Which is still illegal.

Which is also exactly what I predicted. Note, the Commission is claiming it's illegal. The court must decide after Intel gets to present it's defense and submit documents the commission refused to allow.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News