SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: William H Huebl who wrote (7937)10/27/1997 8:22:00 PM
From: Defrocked  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 94695
 
Note on Asset Devaluation
subtitled blatherings of one market observer

For every liability there is an asset but the opposite
is not true. That is, while all liabilities are also
someone else's assets, all assets are not debts.
Some assets are real assets such as
equity, capital goods, land and gold. Assets supported
by liabilities are referred to as financial assets.

The current fear roiling the market is centered
on "asset devaluation" not "earnings evaluation" or
"earnings disappointments". The market refocused its
attention on the former very quickly during the last
month and many investors missed the moved. It was/is
fierce and may run for several days or weeks.

This perception,real or imagined, that rapid decreases
in the ability to pay off debt will decrease financial
assets and potentially real asset values is undeniably
underway in many global markets. Note the sell off in
global equities, gold and the potential for the same
for HK property and even U.S. housing values.

The emerging trading situation is clearly serious. I believe
however that it will work itself out if the Federal Reserve
does nothing . They must provide assurances to the
market but not disastrous rates hikes or inflationary
additions of reserves. Hopefully, AG understands and
maybe even anticipated the problem. Please save us from
active monetarism here.

Just my 2 cents.



To: William H Huebl who wrote (7937)10/27/1997 8:52:00 PM
From: Defrocked  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 94695
 
You tell'em Bill: Don't blame us if you lose your ...!
(shirt?)



To: William H Huebl who wrote (7937)10/28/1997 12:48:00 AM
From: mozek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 94695
 
Sorry to make you nervous Bill. I've posted a number of times here before and believe that I have contributed numerous times in the past. If you remember me, then you'll know that I haven't taken advice and jumped on it blindly. If you don't, then I'm sorry to assume that you would remember. I take responsibility for my trades, and I try to give as well as get from SI. I'm sorry I haven't done something for you lately, and find your post either stressed or quite rude and off-putting (if stressed, then no big deal). Unfortunately, it doesn't make me want to dig deep for ideas to share, but I'll give you some (in spite of the mannerless and presumptive form of your request) and leave you to share your unimaginable gifts with everyone else.

As far as downside, I think there's a great deal of potential downside left, especially in light of tonight's HK and Globex situation. Here are some of my short picks:

I'd look at puts on high risk finance firms like The Money Store or some banks like Wells Fargo due to what I think will be coming loan defaults and personal bankruptcies. Other short picks:

VVUS - Time has run out for the invasive erection remedy due to PFE pill approval

PRST - Still incredibly overvalued, coming competition

After you feel comfortable on the long side, look at VECO, CTEC, RMBS, QWST, and I'm outa here... good trading.



To: William H Huebl who wrote (7937)10/28/1997 2:22:00 AM
From: mozek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 94695
 
Bill, Some contribution reminders from the past, and I'll stop bothering you for information:

July prediction of triggers for this correction which, in retrospect, were pretty accurate:
techstocks.com

Suggestion that people take responsibility for trades:
techstocks.com

Stock suggestion w/100% appreciation since post:
techstocks.com

Mike



To: William H Huebl who wrote (7937)10/28/1997 2:28:00 AM
From: kas1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 94695
 
bill, a lot of talk about institutional vs individual investors. would you have the setup to run a simple bivariate regress on a few thousand stocks, % down today vs % institutional ownership? or let me know where i can get this data in a handy xls or txt format and i can do the regress myself (and triumphantly post results or non-results). would be interesting, no?