SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (65054)5/14/2009 7:56:09 PM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224744
 
"So what have all those climate researchers learned with the hundreds of millions already spent? "

they have learned that if they keep the GW scam going they get millions more



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (65054)5/14/2009 8:42:36 PM
From: TideGlider2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224744
 
Did you see Pelosi accuse the CIA of misleading congress and then saying "they always do"!

Obama will have his boys ditch her. Blago the old wench! lol

She was like a chicken with her head cut off. She claimed she was always speaking from her own experience, then she couldn't find her place in her voluminous notes!

It was hysterical!

Obama needs a face America can trust. He/she must appear smart, wise, warm and tough when needed.

Although I don't know if Pelosi can handle a term not being the speaker.

It might be ver for her. Good riddance!



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (65054)5/14/2009 11:32:08 PM
From: MJ1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224744
 
This article reads like something written by a Junior High Student or used as pablum for children on television nature shows.

It's good to observe but don't tell us that the researchers, observers have the absolute truth or base our future on what may be half-truths or no truths.

What is today is not necessarily what is tomorrow.

mj



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (65054)5/15/2009 8:33:25 AM
From: chartseer3 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224744
 
Why the change in terminology to "climate change" from "global warming"?

chartseer