Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (260228)	5/15/2009 12:42:50 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

"Link or be exposed again as a liar." Tsk, tsk, Elmer. Sooo confrontational. First off, to be exposed again as a liar implies that I have been exposed in the past as a liar. Which is a lie... And you are so brazen considering how many times you have used that. But, ok. Here is one. If Intel has a better and cheaper solution, like it does, then the consumer should pay more so the competition gets a chance too? Message 24809467 Now I suppose you can take the stance that you were just talking about currently. However, the investigation was explicitely about events in the past. If you weren't discussing them, then you were just trying to obfuscate. Which, I grant you, you have a habit of doing. Here is another. If AMD's own misdeeds create a competitive gap Message 24810530 Again, over the period in question AMD was more than competitive. They, in fact had a superior product. Granted, at the time of the post AMD was in the process of screwing up. But that wasn't what the investigation was about. I can find more. You continually try to conflate AMD's present circumstances with what the situation was over the period in question.