SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (260250)5/15/2009 1:51:47 PM
From: fastpathguruRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Sure. But given the topic under discussion was something that happened in the past, in other words Intel's actions during the period covered by the investigation, that would mean you were dragging in extraneous stuff. Presumably to cloud the issue.

A fact I pointed out to him in my followup to that post:

[NONSEQ4]: Refer to current situation, not that of the period in question.

Ahhh, those were good times, good times... Nice to see my arguments back then being buttressed more and more as events unfold, while Elmers' crumble.

fpg



To: combjelly who wrote (260250)5/15/2009 2:19:17 PM
From: Elmer PhudRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
But stop calling me a liar.

What about you? Stop calling me a liar. I didn't call you a liar in the last post. I pointed out that you had a different definition of evidence which included rumors. Additionally you knowingly made false statements about me. I'm not going to call you a liar for doing that when you might just have been confused or mistaken, but I can't control what others think.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News