Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (305251)	5/15/2009 1:54:43 PM
From: mph	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793843

I do, too. That's one of the reasons I think Pelosi will go down. Despite the kind of wife he has, Obama doesn't want to be overshadowed by a woman at work.

To: goldworldnet who wrote (305251)	5/15/2009 4:20:06 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	5 Recommendations Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 793843

Palin's selection has caused her nothing but problems and based on Hillary's experience in the primary, I think it will be a long time before the US has a female president. No, I disagree on both counts. The first serious minority/female candidates for anything always get arrows in their backs. But they 'normalize' it for the next candidates. Palin's selection made her a political star. Ask yourself, did the Left go into such a screeching fury against her because she was a flop? Just the opposite. Hillary's problems as a candidate were self-inflicted. Nearly all were due to over-confidence and ineptitude; very few were due to her sex. As it was, she could have pulled it out if only the Dems didn't have such a wacky primary system.