Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: koan who wrote (97583)	5/15/2009 10:28:41 PM
From: Broken_Clock	3 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116555

Please enlighten us why it is in our best interests to have O become an overnight Bush apologist, implement and enlarge the same bizarre policies Bush used, single handedly accelerate the destruction of the US economy. flip flop on major issues(i.e. the big lie) back and forth like a dying fish...etc. This man ran on CHANGE. The only change we're seeing is an acceleration of the worst Bush policies. So again, please enlighten us to the bigger picture. If no change was needed, then why did he run on CHANGE? If no change was needed, then why are the Dems embracing his Bushevic policies?