SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (481361)5/19/2009 11:30:10 AM
From: TimF1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576012
 
And is, in fact, a fairly extreme libertarian.

Which amounts to zero in term of evidence that he's wrong.

About the only similarity is that they both emphasis collective action.

That's an enormous similarity, or really more than one because they emphasize collective action in many similar ways.

As I said before Obama's pushing a degree of (not the totality of) fascist economics, not all of fascism, since he's not ultra nationalist and not an autocrat.

To say that a country like Norway, which is very socialist from our point of view, has much in common with Fascist Italy boggles credibility.

"Very socialist from our point of view" is pretty irrelevant considering fascism's similarities with socialism. They are far more similar to each other then either is to a free market democracy. The strongest argument against considering Norway fascist are that its apparent relative lack of extensive ultra-nationalist thought in its ruling parties and policies, not the relative amount of socialism.

The article doesn't claim Obama and/or Norway are fascist. What it does do is show that - "Giving support to and then trying to control private corporations, rather than nationalizing them is exactly how the fascists handled it."