Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: prosperous who wrote (50182)	5/17/2009 10:24:26 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217942

diversification did not prove an apparently useful exercise last year, even though, in my view, diversification was helpful, because amongst the undiversify, few did as well as diversified even though i welcome 'buying opportunities' in gold, i cannot say i enjoy the occasional moments when such be ;0/ just as i relish opportunities to buying real estate in hk, even as my stomach churns over. speaking of which, the asking prices in hk real estate has recovered more rather than less to the high watermark. what a strange depression we are having. the biblical learning experience has not been nearly biblical enough, obviously ;0/ now we are back in the same situation as so few years ago, on valuation basis, all stuff and shares (PE basis) are pinned at the come hither high, and interest on deposit at zero across all except aud currency. the bear market really do mean to nastily destroy who cannot stand the suspense and wade into risk.

To: prosperous who wrote (50182)	5/18/2009 4:17:39 PM
From: elmatador	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217942

G.M. Seeks More Imports From Low-Wage Regions increase vehicle imports from its plants in Mexico and Asia while closing factories and cutting the work force in the United States. G.M. Seeks More Imports From Low-Wage Regions Published: May 17, 2009 General Motors is engaged in negotiating a reorganization that could increase vehicle imports from its plants in Mexico and Asia while closing factories and cutting the work force in the United States. That approach drew a sharp rebuke from the United Automobile Workers union on Friday. In a letter to each member of Congress, the U.A.W., which represents G.M. factory workers, argued that to qualify for more government assistance, the auto giant should be required “to maintain the maximum number of jobs in the United States.” The administration, however, appears to accept the proposition that to return to profitability as quickly as possible, G.M. must import a significant percentage of cars from its plants in low-wage countries, like Mexico and China, or low-cost countries, like Japan. G.M. already imports a third of the vehicles that go to showrooms in this country. That percentage would not change in the plan that G.M. is preparing to submit to the administration to justify billions of dollars in new loans to stave off collapse. G.M. would emerge a smaller company, with fewer employees and less output in this country and abroad. But imports would rise from low-cost countries, particularly Mexico and China, and that would be offset by fewer imports from Canada and Europe. Some economists, like David Autor of M.I.T., say that G.M. cars made in China, among other countries, “are pretty competitive and could be sold here.” Others, like Harley Shaiken, at the University of California, Berkeley, argue that if G.M. focused more intensely on technology and auto quality, it could concentrate production in the United States and still be competitive. “The other way to go,” he said, “is to cut costs by importing more vehicles from Mexico and China, and lifting the bottom line that way.” A Treasury spokeswoman said over the weekend that “G.M. and the U.A.W. are in active and constructive deliberations around all aspects of their plan. This is one of several issues they are focused on and the administration is supportive of their efforts to come to a resolution.” G.M. is asking Washington for billions of dollars more in federal loans to survive, on top of the $15.4 billion already borrowed. In a presentation to Congress, the company laid out the plan for the shifts in production to lower-cost countries. In the United States, G.M. would close 16 of its remaining 47 plants and eliminate an additional 21,000 jobs. The company also announced on Friday that 1,100 dealers would be eliminated from its American network by the fall of next year. In the letter to Congress on Friday, Alan Reuther, the U.A.W.’s legislative director, also argued that if G.M. cut back production in Canada, it would hurt small manufacturers in the United States that supply parts to G.M.’s Canadian assembly plants. But the Obama administration apparently sees interference in such plans as crossing a line into industrial policy, rather than helping a giant multinational get back on its feet as a successful, privately managed global operation. Insisting that G.M. preserve American jobs by shifting production to the United States from abroad, this argument goes, would require many times more in federal aid than the $16.3 billion in loans now anticipated. “The idea is to get G.M. off the government dole,” Mr. Autor said. “And if that is the case, then one has to take the steps that a free-standing company must take to be profitable.”