Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (481724)	5/18/2009 2:59:17 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574097

"This was debunked fully yesterday when CJ raised it. " No it wasn't. You just played some word games, declared victory and went home. Like you usually do.

To: i-node who wrote (481724)	5/19/2009 11:30:49 AM
From: bentway	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574097

Panetta wasn't there. He's just trying to be a stand-up guy for his new CIA employees. The letter says what it says, and more than just "that blogger" have read it that way. Now we have ex- Senator Graham's journal, stating that HE wasn't told either at the same time. He'd have had to have had precognition to know to LIE about that particular item, now wouldn't he? CIA lie? You guys insisted the CIA was lying every time it contradicted the Bush admin. Claimed they were out to get Bush. The CIA lies for a living.