Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (481825)	5/18/2009 7:11:57 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574606

See what happens when you lose site of purpose and principle. ... no, you probably don't get it. You're right I don't get it. When did people pick a candidate based on the quality of his/her relationship with their significant other? That's horsesh*t! No one from the outside can possibly know the real nature of a relationship. Furthermore such a judgement is sexist: "They didn’t endorse him, but preferred instead to signal women all over the world, that a couple (Billary) with a publicly dysfunctional marriage should be rewarded with another stint in the White house; this is sad; real sad; especially when women have taken so much crap from men, because too many of them lacked strength, morality, integrity, discipline and character." I've never heard of a man's candidacy getting judged based on their relationship. Are their separate rules for women candidates? I hope not.