Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Whitebeard who wrote (305694)	5/18/2009 5:57:12 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	1 Recommendation Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 793900

She hit something in up-scale democrats. They hated her more than Bush and it was instantaneous. Also, they weren't worried about her in the future, because the MSM would destroy her again. Combine fear of her charisma with hatred of her as a gender, race & class traitor (her husband is a minority & the proles are supposed to vote Democrat). If she were a liberal, all this would vanish in an instant and she would be a heroine. Remember, it's the Democrats who are suckers for youth and beauty in a candidate. So they project more power onto her than she even has. If MSM assaults could destroy candidates, Reagan would never have been elected. Nor GW Bush. Palin has potential. Now if only we could get her to mind-meld with Newt Gingrich. The assumption, of course, is that the MSM is the handmaiden to the democrat party, no surprise there, but it did make me wonder what the better educated democrats secretly think of their union supporters, like the Teamsters. You don't have to assume, just read Franks' What's the Matter with Kansas? They think the great unwashed have false consciousness.