Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The abortion issue: pro-choice vs. anti-abortion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (204)	5/19/2009 10:55:21 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 286

<Both my initial and my current position is that someone quoting someone else as saying they saw a snarl, isn't evidence of "throwing in with right wing hate groups".> You didn't say that... you said: <<"Direct quote", doesn't mean much in the way of evidence. I can quote all sorts of false things if I care to do so.>> <- Y reports that X says it (hearsay, so it would not normally be admissible evidence if this was a court,> Your implying the information is meaningless... The whole world revolves around information they hear from others.. If you havent backpeddled on that, then you're a fool. Fine by me. It's worth noting that you STILL HAVENT checked into what was said! LOL <The whole point here is that you provided no substance.> I provided evidence that the president of a Catholic University saw hatred by the group at Notre Dame... PERIOD. We never got past that point, because you denied it. The fact that you cant see that, simply says where you're at. Fine by me. < the piece is quoting the president of a Catholic University... and says nothing about "one person" > <The president of Catholic University is one person.> Again, your simply either lying through your teeth, stupid, or old and senile and childlike in your approach. YOU said: <<Ignoring any possible doubt that someone was actually snarling, still leaves you with one person that may or may not be full of hate.>> Implying clearly there was (maybe, you can't even admit that) one hateful person there... Good nite. DAK