Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (8348)	5/20/2009 8:16:55 AM
From: Little Joe	1 Recommendation Respond to of 86356

Since most of this research is funded by someone, maybe, in the interests of full disclosure, they should publish the sponser of the research. Would be interesting. lj

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (8348)	5/20/2009 9:18:04 AM
From: RetiredNow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86356

Hawk, the truth is that with statistical analysis we can check to see if sunspots are more highly correlated with temperature change than CO2. They've done that analysis and scientists say that the correlation with CO2 is greater. It doesn't mean that sunspots don't influence temperature, because it clearly does. However, it does mean that sunspots are not the prime root cause. That's the state of the latest analysis. I believe in science and statistical analysis and that's what it is telling us.