Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (65562)	5/21/2009 10:02:45 AM
From: TideGlider	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224724

If they are attacking people or over-populated, yes. However, your question is relatively vague and worthless.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (65562)	5/21/2009 12:47:36 PM
From: Alan Smithee	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224724

Just think about all the wild animals who will get killed. Does that make you happy? That has to be the most absurd post I've run across in the past few days. Are you saying that because someone with a valid concealed weapons permit can now legally carry in a National Park, they're going to take pot shots at bears and eagles? Please tell me, your post was a joke.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (65562)	5/21/2009 12:49:28 PM
From: Oral Roberts	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224724

Are you retarded? Do you think because someone is carrying they are going to be indiscriminately shooting wildlife for kicks? That is damn near the dumbest thing you've ever posted.