SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: average joe who wrote (306169)5/21/2009 11:14:56 AM
From: DMaA3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793682
 
Trying to start something eh? Trolling for an intemperant comment?

and boil them in hot oil.

ed. I see you removed that from your post. Wise move.



To: average joe who wrote (306169)5/21/2009 12:07:28 PM
From: Alan Smithee1 Recommendation  Respond to of 793682
 
Their lawyers will probably cry entrapment.

Entrapment is a tough one to prove. The person doing the entrapping has to cause someone to do something he otherwise wouldn't have done. It's not entrapment if they were predisposed to commit the act in the first place.



To: average joe who wrote (306169)5/21/2009 12:33:47 PM
From: mph2 Recommendations  Respond to of 793682
 
Perhaps if they were merely charged with acquiring the bombs.
Good luck with arguing entrapment for trying to set them.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News