Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (482669)	5/21/2009 11:59:56 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573717

You're making this all up. The judge rules in BK court, not Obama. No, Obama tried to put the fix in before the BK court. It worked with government controlled entities (TARP banks). Intimidation was the tool for non-TARP recepients. Link please. Just read the above paragraph, and imagine time before 2009. Where would you think it took place? My first bet would have been Venezuela. Stop fantasizing....you sound like Cheney. We are turning into Venezuela and our president into Hugo Chavez. Only in your mind. Then why do you feel the need to defend Chase, Citi , Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley et al? Again, I am defending secured creditors, regardless of who they are. You may be one of them through some 401k or pension fund. And you don't think these funds have enough money to hire attorneys to protect their interests. Why don't I believe you? It is quite possible that whoever is managing those fund was strongarmed into violating his fiduciary responsibility, and agreed to Obama's demand to hand over your money to UAW. You're fantasizing again. Stick to the facts. And, to add insult to injury, on top of this money Obama wants to confiscate and hand it over to UAW, he is handing taxpayer money to UAW. Link please.