Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Biotech Valuation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Biomaven who wrote (31291)	5/22/2009 10:17:08 AM
From: Arthur Radley	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 52153

thestreet.com Don't always agree with Fuerstein, but he does present a compelling case for Medivation, based on the Cougar deal with J&J.

To: Biomaven who wrote (31291)	5/28/2009 8:17:31 PM
From: DewDiligence_on_SI	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52153

[OT] Re: SEC investigation of iHub I guess I'd be very surprised based on what I've seen at SI if Matt etc. were involved in any way. I agree—innocent until proven guilty would seem to be a reasonable approach here. However, hordes of iHub posters evidently disagree and want Matt’s employment terminated ASAP. There’s an entire board on iHub dedicated to this topic and it has 6,000 posts in only one week of operation: siliconinvestor.com I think some of these posters have too much free time!