Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Welcome to Slider's Dugout -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (17540)	5/22/2009 4:36:00 PM
From: I_C_Deadpeople	Respond to of 50209

Can't implement the long planned UN agenda of global governance under a singular global central bank unless this crisis is fully levered. And it's going to be Open question, thoughts welcome. There is an obvious consensus that the US as an Empire is faltering and probably done. I question though the idea of the UN style global government or the Kissinger One World Bank/government. This to me seems to fly against the idea of a superpower power combo like Russia/China becoming the next power. Why would they want to share that with the not so popular UN? Does the UN have any power in the Far East? I really see the UN as a useless and powerless organization and you can throw the IMF in with them. Are not those organizations linked to the US and/or the US elite? If so, the Russia/China agenda will be to separate themselves from any US based organization.