SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cactus Jack who wrote (204022)5/24/2009 7:03:12 AM
From: saveslivesbydayRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (that repealed Glass-Steagall) was also hugely popular - 90% of lawmakers voted for it

It wasn't "pushed through" either - though in retrospect the motives of the banking industry with this legislation are clear

As are the unintended consequences of Citi, BAC, and the WS Brokerages selling MBS and CDO's.

That's the point I was making, that some legislation looks better on the surface than in reality,
not that it wasn't popular among voters at the time.



To: Cactus Jack who wrote (204022)5/24/2009 11:41:32 AM
From: bentwayRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
"it was voted into law through a voter initiative by a wide margin -- 65% in favor."

The initiative process is why CA is such a cluster-f*ck basket case today. The voters have demanded services and refuse to pay for them. Obviously unsustainable.



To: Cactus Jack who wrote (204022)5/24/2009 1:15:12 PM
From: Bank Holding CompanyRespond to of 306849
 
Repealing prop13 would solve the problem. But we need to maximize political drama and try everything else first.