Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (111851)	5/25/2009 6:18:10 AM
From: Lane3	Respond to of 541918

As in "The greenhouse effect is extremely doubtful" [Danish: Drivhuseffekten er yderst tvivlsom]. I don't see how you can claim to know what he meant by that. We have no context for those words. So I don't see how that snippet alone can effectively refute his other comments, for which we have extensive context and repetition. I think that the most you can reasonably claim is some lingering reservation about his later assertions. As for the terminology, I can google, too. From the University of Arizona: "Common Greenhouse Effect (GHE) Misconceptions GHE is related to ozone depletion. GHE involves reflected sunlight. GHE is new phenomenon on Earth. GHE is harmful to life. GHE on Earth is intermediate between that on Mars and Venus due to distance from sun. GHE is caused by smog and air pollution. GHE is same as global warming."