Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Think4Yourself who wrote (204138)	5/25/2009 7:48:52 PM
From: Slumdog	Respond to of 306849

dille.dk

To: Think4Yourself who wrote (204138)	5/25/2009 9:48:17 PM
From: energyplay	Respond to of 306849

How to keep out squatters, etc. ? Guard dogs and burglar alarms. Someone comes by to feed and check on the dog every day. There will be a dog poo problem, but that can be reduced by laying down drop cloths, etc. The burglar alarm checks that the dog is okay. Squatters and most lower level criminals have a disproportionate fear of dogs, and will avoid them. Higher level criminals won't be going after your copper pipes.

To: Think4Yourself who wrote (204138)	5/26/2009 8:23:57 AM
From: Pogeu Mahone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

JQP I know you are not perceptive and need things spelled out for you , here you go : China's banks to absorb shocks in 2009, says S&P By Daniel Inman 8 January 2009 The ratings agency predicts that the problems facing Chinese banks this year will not be big enough to result in ratings downgrades. Standard and Poor's outlook on China's banking sector is stable. "Major banks are financially positioned to absorb the shocks that are likely to mark 2009, provided the government doesn't interfere too much in their lending processes," the ratings agency says in a report published yesterday. The problems that the sector faces are not of a magnitude that they could lead to a negative ratings change on the major banks, it concludes. [This is the same S&P that gave 'AAA' ratings to toxic subprime securities, but they might know what they are talking about this time.] a very big LOL