Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Martin Wormser who wrote (65425)	5/26/2009 11:02:06 PM
From: loantech	Respond to of 78417

Martin I would say to ask other people with more knowledge than mine. Claude is a good one to answer this question.

To: Martin Wormser who wrote (65425)	5/27/2009 12:47:17 AM
From: chip	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78417

I'll take a shot at that. One logical use of your figures would be: (stock price * shares out)/(ozs mined * cost per oz) Performing this would give RIC a value of about 10.5 and ARZ about 50. ARZ would therefore be ~5X pricier than RIC?

To: Martin Wormser who wrote (65425)	5/27/2009 1:20:25 AM
From: AlphaRomero	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78417

Running your numbers roughly: at $950/oz, Aurizon has approximately 4.5x the cash flow and 6.5x the market cap. (There are other variables, though...I don't even know off-hand which country Aurizon operates in. If it's Mexico, that would account for the difference. You might also subtract their cash on hand from MC and RIC would probably look even better) ...just thinking off the top of my head...my advice may be worth no more than you paid for it! And CGLD.OB looks even better...roughly same MC as RIC and higher cash flow (and the main property is open at depth and strike) finance.yahoo.com