Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito who wrote (112007)	5/27/2009 11:03:32 AM
From: Bread Upon The Water	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541712

Landlord tenant law is a matter left to the states (under the US Constitution). If the Federal Government is in effect altering the state notification requirements for eviction (which is what I understood the original message posted here on the subject to say) what they are doing may be unconstitutional. Now IF as part of the foreclosure process the purchaser of the foreclosed property AGREES to the new notification terms in order to get Federal guarantees on the financing etc. or as some new condition of the bank loan, that MAY BE how the the constitutional requirements are bypassed. I was once up on this in a fairly knowledgeable way , but am no longer current. I do believe the basic principles I've discussed still apply, but will yield to someone with current (legal) expertise.