Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ajtj99 who wrote (204487)	5/27/2009 11:11:38 AM
From: Smiling Bob	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

They're obviously still very tight Amr was Bob's meal ticket. He protected Amr and his network and continues to do so, in hopes that one day he'll return. Tens or hundred of millions of dollars was being played with, depending on how directly you view it. Message 18299807 I'm surprised that no one at Raging Bull was ever formally charged with anything. They were the worst. I believe at one time, their administration was controlled by organized crime. Scott Cohn wanted me to talk about it on the air, but I had to refuse. There were some very graphic death threats made over there.

To: ajtj99 who wrote (204487)	5/27/2009 12:33:26 PM
From: Smiling Bob	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

Here's a good post from Bob, flat out denying his relationship with AP. Swears he wasn't communicating then- but not long after the friggin guy's practically having conjugals. Message 18320991 ---- To: Smiling Bob who wrote (5056) 12/10/2002 12:54:07 PM From: (Bob) Zumbrunnen Read Replies (1) of 15193 One thing nice about cyberspace versus real-life You can paint yourself in a corner, one foot firmly hooked onto your bicuspids, and simply bid adieu. As you repeatedly demonstrate. It's well know you'd maintained communications with Amr outside of SI. Well-known? I doubt it's even "widely believed". In any event, it's patently false. Given his obvious reasons for being on SI and your ability to overlook his advertising what was a very lucrative service, it would make one wonder. "What would've been in it for me?" is what it makes this one wonder. You can't even cite a motive. Duh! Not surprisingly, you say that "evidence" of different kinds of "wrongdoing" on my part exist, including the ridiculous notion that I edited your messages, yet you refuse to show any of this "evidence". Because it doesn't exist. I recite the same "script" each time because it's the truth. Because someone repeatedly says that two plus two equals four doesn't mean that it's really five. I'm kinda curious. Does any of your "evidence" involve black helicopters or crop circles?