Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Corel Corp. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: opalapril who wrote (3293)	10/28/1997 12:23:00 AM
From: John Goldthorp	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9798

Good paraphrase if not direct quote Maybe he needed the money, I don't know. The shorts may have been issued. But it seems to me the question is .... will (or have they) been covered? Maybe the January effect will answer this question. The winters in Ireland and Canada are difficult, as you know ... And the fall in Hong Kong is strangely related to this phenomenon. John

To: opalapril who wrote (3293)	10/28/1997 7:42:00 PM
From: Vanni Resta	Respond to of 9798

opalapril wrote: "Wilde also said something like, "If it's worth doing it's worth doing to excess." So, why didn't Cowpland sell the whole company short instead of a measly 25%? Ooops. Maybe he did." We will find out when the lawsuit proceeds. FOCUS ON THE LAWSUIT AGAINST COREL AND COWPLAND FOR COWPLANDS QUESTIONABLE SALE OF 25% OF HIS HOLDING WEEKS BEFORE THE COMPANY ANNOUNCES BAD NEWS THAT MAKES ITS STOCK LOSE 35% IN VALUE!!! For information on the lawsuit, contact: milberg.com Happy Investing! Vanni