SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (8557)5/27/2009 3:40:00 PM
From: jrhana  Respond to of 86350
 
Good idea. Start off with a fairly low rate and gradually increase it. Combine that with a build up of the infrastructure needed to get the NG to market.

Meantime they could be working on Wind, Nuclear, Solar geothermal etc etc etc.

But what really distinguishes NG is how quickly a much higher and sustained level of production could be brought on board.

It's there for the taking.

As I've said before: "It's called natural gas. It's clean. It's cheap. It's abundant. It's ours. And the choice is yours, guys."

siliconinvestor.com



To: Brumar89 who wrote (8557)5/27/2009 3:52:19 PM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86350
 
I'd rather see a floor put on oil. Make it $80 or $90 and then if it falls below that, tax it to get it back to that amount. Use the taxes collected to spur substitutes. That's the best thing we could do.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News