SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sepku who wrote (9842)10/28/1997 12:30:00 AM
From: Zoltan!  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 77400
 
You are wrong on just about everything. The usual. But especially:

Strrrrriiiiiiike three!! Economic policy does not reflect in corporate earnings and
therefore the stock market overnight following a changing of power from one party to
another. Republican control of Congress in late 1994 with a Dem. Admin. assured
partisan gridlock even to this day...you can thank Clinton via email for his economic
policies being put in place between '92 and '94 for the last 3 years of fantastic market
gains.


The stock market did take off only after the Dems were defeated in a historic election, ending over 40 years of entrenched control. Markets do respond to such major psychological events. (Remember clinton was opposed to balancing the budget before that tide). Actually clinton's few feeble policy changes in the first two years only slowed the economy a bit, reducing earnings for corporations from what they might have been.

Regards from your better



To: sepku who wrote (9842)10/28/1997 12:37:00 AM
From: Greg Jung  Respond to of 77400
 
My opinion (which nobody asked for)

The 1993 budget deal set it up. Much more optimism in the air
that November. California given special attention (Say thank you, Mr. Rogers). Then the gridlock which the republican wall streeters love.

Greg

Cisco: Don't touch it above 60.
Coms: Expect it lower, also.