Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (12982)	5/28/2009 11:42:03 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 103300

Re: "Forget the bravado," What 'bravado' are you talking about? Don't know what you are talking about there. Re: "you're too wrapped up in the game of it all..." What 'game' are you referring to? (All I'm interested in is achieving a strategic victory over the only remaining Stalinist government in the world. That should be no 'game'.) Re: "...take a look at the obvious, they can now deliver a nuclear weapon to all of Asia..." Hard to ignore that. (And I certainly wasn't ignoring it!) I suspect that everyone in the world is probably aware of N.K. nuclear potential now! And that is EXACTLY what the North Korean leadership wants! That is the 'card' that they are playing to try to win survival for the dynasty and their corrupt Stalinist state. (and it is nearly the last card that they have....) But, you can never hope to achieve any kind of victory if you keep your eyes closed to what is actually going on over there... the succession struggle that is happening behind the scenes --- 'Fearless Leader' so crippled and gone-loopy they can't even dare to have him show his face in public any more, and his designated successor - his youngest son - fighting like a caged rat behind the scenes with military rivals (not to mention military leaders who can envision themselves in the head slot as Dictator once the old fool dies...) has not consolidated the reins of power yet. Whole place could go 'Kaflooie' at any time now... now that they have played their last two 'aces' and got nothing left to play.) Still... I expect that this is the 'end of the beginning of the middle' years for the Stalinist dynasty now... and that they are LOSING. Even their last two remaining allies are starting to back away from them now....

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (12982)	5/28/2009 11:45:19 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 103300

South Asia nuclear upgrades worry United States * Experts fear proliferation chances will grow with size of nuclear programmes of India and Pakistan * New administration does not see Pakistan’s programme in isolation from India’s * Defence Intelligence Agency director says Pakistan has taken important steps but vulnerabilities still exist Daily Times Monitor dailytimes.com.pk\05\29\story_29-5-2009_pg7_13 LAHORE: Next year Pakistan will start churning out plutonium for its nuclear arsenal, which will eventually include warheads for ballistic missiles and cruise missiles capable of being launched from ships, submarines or aircraft. In India, engineers are designing cruise missiles to carry nuclear warheads. India is also trying to equip its Agni missiles with such warheads and to deploy them on submarines. US and allied officials and experts who have tracked developments in South Asia have grown increasingly worried over the rapid growth of the region’s nuclear programmes, according to Washington Post. India and Pakistan see their nuclear programmes as vital points of leverage in an arms race that has begun to take on the pace and diversity of US-Russian nuclear competition during the Cold War. “More vulnerabilities. More stuff in production. More stuff in transit,” when it is more vulnerable to theft, said Rolf Mowatt-Larssen, formerly the CIA’s top official on weapons of mass destruction and the Energy Department’s director of intelligence during the George W Bush administration. Programme size: US experts also worry that as the size of the programmes grows, chances increase that a rogue scientist or military officer will attempt to sell nuclear parts or know-how. Indian officials say efforts are underway to improve and test a powerful thermonuclear warhead. “Delivery system-wise, India is doing fine,” said Bharat Karnad, a former member of India’s National Security Advisory Board and a professor of national security studies at New Delhi’s Centre for Policy Research. US officials say narrow appeals to the two countries to slow their weapons work will probably fail. “We have to think of dealing with the South Asian problem not on a purely regional basis, but in the context of a more global approach,” Gary Samore, the senior White House non-proliferation adviser. Samore said the “Pakistani government has always said they will do that in conjunction with India. The Indians have always said ‘we can’t take steps unless similar steps are taken by China and the other nuclear states,’ and very quickly you end up with a situation where it’s hard to make progress.” Some experts worry, however, that the United States may not have the luxury of waiting to negotiate a treaty that would curtail the global production of fissile materials – a pact that President Obama says he hopes to complete during his first term. Lt-Gen Michael Maples, director of the Defence Intelligence Agency, told senators days before his retirement in March that “Pakistan continues to develop its nuclear infrastructure, expand nuclear weapons stockpiles, and seek more advanced warheads and delivery systems.” He added that although Pakistan has “taken important steps to safeguard its nuclear weapons . . . vulnerabilities still exist”. Pakistani officials dismiss suggestions of an acceleration in South Asia’s arms race. “If two are sufficient, why build 10?” asked Brig Nazir Ahmed Butt, defence attache in Pakistan’s embassy in Washington. “We’re not in a numbers game. People should not take a technological upgrade for an expansion.” Abdul Mannan, director of transport and waste safety for Pakistan’s nuclear regulatory authority, said in a 2007 presentation that “a country like Pakistan is not well equipped” to contain radioactive fallout from an attack on a nuclear shipment. Isolation: While Pakistan’s nuclear programme has lately attracted the most worry, because of the close proximity to the Taliban insurgents, many US experts say that it should not be considered in isolation from India’s nuclear expansion. Some experts say that a civil nuclear cooperation agreement that Bush signed with India in October benefits the country’s weapons programmes, because it sanctions India’s import of uranium and allows the military to draw on enriched uranium produced by eight reactors that might otherwise be needed for civil power.