Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (112168)	5/29/2009 12:14:51 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541736

It is as equal as "separate but equal". It may be as just as separate but equal (in practice thus being unjust), but its far more equal. Even if separate but equal was a serious attempt to make things equal (and it almost always was not), the separateness is itself a difference. But I'm talking about treatment that's identical, you can't get more equal than that. Within the point under consideration its perfect equality. Its a basic logical and mathematical principle. A=A. Of course if you give a 70 lb child and an NFL defense tackle the same amount of heavy lifting to do, your also treating them identically/equally. "Equal" doesn't imply that your treating people the right way, or even that you avoiding abuse or injustice.