SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (112189)5/29/2009 2:01:47 PM
From: Katelew  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541733
 
Tim, it seems to me that you have an excellent legal mind or judicious bent to your reasoning. Are you an attorney?



To: TimF who wrote (112189)5/29/2009 2:11:48 PM
From: Mary Cluney  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541733
 
<<<My actual logic was essentially X=X, if that's flawed than all of logic is flawed. I think you have a problem with my premises not with my logic.>>>

You are not proving that X=X. You are trying to prove that X=Y. In mathematics, it would be like you are proving X is equivalent in value to Y. As in X=3+2+1 and Y=1+2+3 therefore X=Y.

In your case you are saying X=sbs Y=blne and X=Y.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News