Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (484307)	5/29/2009 8:53:09 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573696

Because they have a vested interest in not having nuclear weapons being slung around their continent. As far as standing on the sideline issuing communiques, yeah. Anything much further beyond that? I don't see it. When there was this 6 party negotiation, Russia was certainly the 6th and the last party. Look on a map. If NK starts dropping nukes on SK, who gets affected most by the fallout? They too have a vested interest in keeping nukes to a minimum in their area. Bad for business and all that. First, NK does not have a lot of bombs. After the first one or two, they are out. So it is not like China would be preventing further fallout after NK lobbed their entire inventory at SK. I don't have an agenda here, just trying to explore the issue. Mainly your and Tanch's assertion that China and Russia would get involved somehow militarily punishing NK. I don't see it. I just see (worry about) the US (again) getting stuck with the problems there. Joe