Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FJB who wrote (307579)	5/29/2009 3:51:05 PM
From: Maurice Winn	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793757

Robert, they can calculate well enough to know that welfare is an excellent career path for women having children if their alternatives pay less. Not only do they get a lifestyle without having to go to work, they get the pleasure of having a family and probably some care in old age and help in the meantime. Forced sterilization is NOT the answer. That's just more of Big Brother criminal bossiness. The answer is the women keeping their legs together if they don't want to have children. Don't pay them to have children and they'll be more circumspect about pregnancy. If they don't have a good contract, including cash up front, with the man who wishes to impregnate them, then they had better be ready for some sorry times. It's an eons-old issue going back to chimps and is why marriage was invented in the first place. Mqurice