SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (112222)5/29/2009 5:44:17 PM
From: cosmicforce  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541965
 
>should we provide benefits and special recognition to these partnerships or not<

If "not" it is not "equal protection". All or none. I don't have a problem with people partnering for non-sexual unions in which one person is the primary breadwinner and they share a home. The country benefits from these unions as much as marriage.

Here is my view on polygamy and marriage.
Message 25673045



To: TimF who wrote (112222)5/29/2009 6:58:57 PM
From: Katelew  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541965
 
Well said, Tim.

I've always felt that the passage of gay marriage lays a foundation from which to launch the legalization of polygamy.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News