SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (484860)6/1/2009 1:30:15 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 1574326
 
With respect to the USSC, the Court will also accept cases which would help settle a split of authority among various circuit courts where there is no final USSC decision.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (484860)6/1/2009 1:30:30 PM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574326
 
You know what obama should do and since when i say these things somehow he seems to respond---he should apologize for voting against Roberts. He is asking repubs to be de-partisanize process but needs to address dems objections to roberts and alito as well. Its the golden rule. He who has the gold rules and that is most notable in SCOTUS picks for they are lifetime appointments. I have never been a fan of that. Am for age limitations or terms for justices but that involves amending the constituition and that aint happening..



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (484860)6/1/2009 4:35:44 PM
From: combjelly1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574326
 
"Right, but scores of decisions are sent through the appeals process, almost always by the losers"

Not at the appellate level. According to figures, The USSC overturns about 3 quarters of the decisions that they decide to take on. Which shouldn't be a surprise because they only take on about 1% of the ones that make it to their level and they are more likely to take those they see flaws with than ones they think are likely to be upheld.