SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: dvdw© who wrote (50898)6/5/2009 12:17:45 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 217593
 
Social bonding. A remark can be made for internal consumption as it reverberates inside the country. Any politician -and he was talking to Gordon Brown- knows that. We as analysts of the fabric of societies need to analyse it under this perspective.

A politician needs constantly to speak in terms that are understood by his constituency.

Be very careful when you when using "kleptocracy and racism"

All governments would be kleptocratic and racist if they could.

The past has always showed that kleptocracy and racism have been good to countries to raise.

Kleptocracy -they were not called 'Robber Barons' for nothing- since it accummulates wwealth and racism that created social capital by aglutinating people with common interests.

A non-racist society -where you have mulatoes, mamelukos and cafuzos- take much longer to get wealth than a racist society.

A politician from a racial democracy -racial democracy understood as interbreeding- can communicate to his constituency through racial shorthands.

In non-racial democracies, this is not part of the politicians parlance. Is a taboo to mention race in non-racial democracies.

One ned to create a newspeak to talk about race, can't balck a negro. Must be African-American.