Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : American International Petroleum Corp -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MARIO PASQUA who wrote (4233)	10/28/1997 10:28:00 AM
From: Sycamore	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 11888

Mario, Thanks for posting that article. I have started reading messages on this thread a few days ago and have learned a lot. Geneat, Mario, Cathi, Faris and others: Thanks to you, I think you are providing good arguments. From the investors point of view, what your saying made sense. No stocks are safe as evidenced with what happen to "Oxford Health" yesterday, all of them carry a certain risk. With regards to AIPN, compared to other emerging stocks out there, and based on the analysis on the stock that I've seen, I feel that AIPN is worth the risk. Gut feel tells me that it will go a lot higher than 9 dollars before the year is over. QDog: Just wondering why analysts on Wall Street are using .50-1.00 as their basis of valuation or bench mark for estimating "potential" reserve???? Why not 4 cents or even 1 cent??? Could it be that base on past experiences by true experts in the field that these are the reasonable numbers to use??? While I admire your depth of knowledge on the subject and appreciate your contribution to this thread, don't you think you are focusing too much on the negative aspects of similar deals that have gone sour in the past, how about siting those that have produced good results as well. With your experience in this area, I'm sure you know a lot of them. sycamore