SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: average joe who wrote (486443)6/8/2009 9:39:33 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573222
 
Perhaps -- but AFAIK they were not "sneaking in" to NK. These women appear to have been kidnapped, and even if they had accidentally strayed across the border that does not justify a sentence of 12 yrs hard labor.

I believe if they worked for Ross Perot he'd get their asses out.

It is clear that our CIA needs to be permitted eliminate Kim Jong Il. I'm not quite sure how they'd do it, but this is a classic example of why we need a CIA that can assassinate a foreign president now and then. There is little doubt that assassination of Saddam would have been preferable to the Iraq war for many reasons.

Not that Obama would ever authorize such a thing.



To: average joe who wrote (486443)6/9/2009 12:46:02 AM
From: bentway1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1573222
 
"do they want to risk giving NK a reason to fire a nuclear ICBM across the Pacific?"

Message 25702081

Lord, please save us from the dumb, fear mongered (R)'s!



To: average joe who wrote (486443)6/9/2009 1:24:42 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1573222
 
And even if they did have the military might, nothing would happen because do they want to risk giving NK a reason to fire a nuclear ICBM across the Pacific?

When did NK get a nuke ICBM?